ScienceWatch
A Diet that Fits
the Bill

Sexual dimorphism, which refers to features differing between
males and females, is common among animals. Males may be larger (or
smaller) than females, they may be more (or less) colorful, or
one sex may have structures (e.g., deer antlers) lacking in the
other. Charles Darwin observed these differences, and in his 1871
book, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex,
he offered three mechanisms for their evolution. The first was
sexual selection, which in its extreme yields the flashy feathers
of male birds of paradise. The second was selection for
fertility, which can result, for example, in more robust females
(witness the fact that women live longer on average than men).
The third mechanism was selection due to the environment.
Numerous instances of the first two mechanisms have been found in
nature; however, the only instance where ecology appears to be
the cause for sexual dimorphism occurs in mosquitoes. Male
mosquitoes have mouthparts adapted for drinking nectar, while
female mouthparts are adapted for drinking blood.
In the July 21st issue of the journal Science,
evolutionbiologist Ethan Temeles and his students at Amherst
College show that a difference in the food supply (differing
flower shape) of purple-throated carib hummingbirds (Eulampis
jugularis) has resulted in extreme bill differences between
the sexes. Females are 25% smaller than males, yet their bills
are 30% longer on average and have a greater downward curve (30°
vs. 15° for males; see silhouettes below)
. Sexual selection for larger males is inconsistent with the
smaller bills of males, since their bills should have increased
proportionately. Apparently carib bill size has been subject to a
different selection pressure than the one causing increased body
size.
The birds live on the island of St. Lucia in the West Indies,
where the only food plants available during the breeding season
are a red-bracted flower (Heliconia caricaea) and a
green-bracted flower (H. bihai). The hummingbirds are
the sole pollinators of these flowers. Temeles and his students
spent four weeks, at a time when the birds were actively nesting
and rearing young, watching the birds that visited both types of
flowers. They quickly noticed a pattern: all of the 15 males they
observed fed from H. caricaea, whereas 11 of the 15
females chose H. bihai instead. A comparison of the two Heliconia
flowers showed that the H. bihai blossoms fed upon
by the females were longer and more curved (average of 44 mm, 31o),
than the H. caricaea flowers visited by the males (average
of 38 mm, 21o). The striking correspondence between flower length
and curvatures, and carib bill length and curvatures is strong
evidence that the bills of each sex have become specialized for
efficiently feeding from different species of flowers. This
hypothesis received additional support when the researchers
observed that female feeding times were significantly shorter
when they fed at H. bihai flowers as compared to those
of H. caricaea.
How did the carib hummingbird sexes become specialized to feed
from two different food sources? Observing that both males and
females fiercely defend their patch of flowers against
conspecifics, Temels suggests that food competition between the
sexes is the most likely explanation. However, males also use
their flower patch to attract a mate and their success is based
upon the number of flowers they defend. Coincidently, of the two
available Heliconia species, H. caribaea bears
two to three times as many flowers as H. bihai. Temeles
speculates that thousands of years ago, when the hummingbirds
first arrived on the island, a patch of H. caribaea was
more valuable for males, who would then drive out the smaller
females, forcing them to feed on the less floral H. bihai.
Thus, the food partitioning may have begun as a result of sexual
selection for males with bountiful territories. Once the two
sexes began feeding predominately on different shaped flowers,
natural selection may then have acted on the bill proportions of
males and females to yield the difference.
Saul Scheinbach